ProstPlanAI
All lessonsLesson 02 · Intermediate

Indicating or omitting extended pelvic lymph node dissection

Briganti + randomized-trial evidence on the same screen.

Video lesson · a walkthrough of the app screens with narration · available in Portuguese and English
5 min 6 steps

Objective

Decide, based on quantitative risk and guidelines, whether ePLND should be performed — and justify the decision with RCT evidence.

Clinical scenario

Extended lymph node dissection improves staging but adds morbidity. The question is objective: does this patient's risk of lymph node invasion justify the procedure?

Step by step in the app

  1. 1

    Ensure the input data

    PSA, clinical stage, ISUP grade group and the percentage of high-grade cores must be filled in — these are the Briganti variables.

  2. 2

    Open the Lymph Node Dissection (PLND)

    In the More menu, open the PLND module. The app computes the probability of lymph node invasion.

  3. 3

    Compare against the thresholds

    The system applies the 7% (Briganti) and 5% (EAU) thresholds and recommends performing or omitting the ePLND.

  4. 4

    Explore the regional list

    See the probability per lymph node chain (e.g., right/left obturator) and the estimated number of lymph nodes in the template.

  5. 5

    Open the XAI panel

    Understand how much each factor (PSA, stage, ISUP, % high-grade cores) contributed to the risk.

  6. 6

    Contextualize with the RCTs

    Read the interpretation of the randomized trials by ISUP/LNI subgroup before finalizing the plan.

Clinical pearls

  • Risk below 5% rarely justifies the morbidity of ePLND — the app makes this explicit.
  • The regional list helps plan the template, not just the binary decision of whether to operate.
  • The built-in RCT reading keeps the decision from relying on the nomogram alone.

References

  • Briganti/Gandaglia 2017 (AUC 90.8%)
  • Roscigno et al. 2018
  • Lestingi et al. 2021 (phase III)